Skip to content
Fanhackers

Fanhackers

Your guide to research on fans.

Menu

  • About Fanhackers
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Fan Studies Bibliography
  • Contact

henry jenkins

Fan commercial power: is there such a thing?

Fannish communities feel a sense of ownership over their media, but this feeling does not make them powerful in a sense. Like the poachers of old, fans operate from a position of cultural marginality and social weakness. Like other popular

Szabo Dorottya 15/12/202515/12/2025 fanhackers Read more

Pick me up for syndication!

Media fandoms are one of the most representative cases of fandom studies. When looking at television programming, the discourse does not question whether television is a social genre, but in what way it is. Perhaps media fandoms were so visible

Szabo Dorottya 16/11/202516/11/2025 fanhackers Read more

The social life of bookmark tags

Paratext (on the Internet) has historically been used, not only for folksonomy, but for social functions, too. This is true for websites that have a broader range of social media-like features, such as comments, likes and private messages and for

Szabo Dorottya 22/07/202522/02/2026 fanhackers Read more

The friends we made along the way

Discussing who the characters are and what canon is, is one of fandom’s most familiar activities. Fan reading, however, is a social process through which individual interpretations are shaped and reinforced through ongoing discussions with other readers. Such discussions expand

Szabo Dorottya 06/11/202306/11/2023 Uncategorised Read more

The Classics of Fan Studies: Henry Jenkins – Textual Poachers

“Fan fiction is a way of the culture repairing the damage done in a system where contemporary myths are owned by corporations instead of owned by the folk.” Today we’re continuing our exploration of the classics of fan studies with

Maggie 01/08/202301/08/2023 Uncategorised Read more

Aca fan discourse, fandom academic discourse

Fan criticism is the institutionalization of feminime reading practices just as the dominant mode of academic criticism is the institutionalization of masculine learning practices. JENKINS, HENRY (1992). TEXTUAL POACHER, ROUTLEDGE, 118. If Jenkins already saw fandom as a type of

Szabo Dorottya 19/02/202319/02/2023 fanhackers Read more

How the visual image of the star can contribute to the actor/character resonance?

Earlier, in this post, we have talked about Jenkins’ idea of how fans, in the process of slashing, might read the body of characters (especially in media fandoms). We also talked about in this post I quoted Cathy Yue Wang

Szabo Dorottya 29/10/202129/10/2021 fanhackers Read more

RPF as reading the body (of text)

The process of slashing a text is described by Jenkins as reading the body for clues of a relationship. Here and in other such moments, characters retrace the steps of the fan viewers who have searched the performers’ bodies for

Szabo Dorottya 02/07/202102/07/2021 fanhackers Read more

RPF, once more

Over the last week, we received many responses to the question how RPF can operate without a canon text, the majority of them among the lines of much the same way non-RPF fandoms do: by constantly negotiating fanon interpretations. It

Szabo Dorottya 12/03/202112/03/2021 fanhackers Read more

A network of early zine making communities

Fanzine publishing remains highly receptive to new participants. As Constance Penley (1991) notes, fanzine editors are torn between competing impulses toward “professionalism” (the development of high technical standards and the showcasing of remarkable accomplishments) and “acceptance” (openness and accessibility for

Szabo Dorottya 24/08/202024/08/2020 fanhackers Read more
  • « Previous

Your guide to research on fans

  • Fanhackers is a project of the Organization for Transformative Works (OTW) that makes fan studies scholarship more accessible. We help fans find and access research on fan culture, and encourage fan participation in scholarship through the contribution of personal experiences, new research, and community interaction.
  • We post about fan studies research here and on Tumblr and Twitter, and maintain a bibliography of fan studies research. Contributions welcome!

New in the Fan Studies Bibliography

11806 1 chicago-author-date 5 dateadded desc https://fanhackers.transformativeworks.org/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/

Search for more fan studies research.

More research tools and resources by the OTW

  • Fanlore wiki: Find and record info on fans
  • Transformative Works and Cultures: A journal for open access academic work on fans

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
Copyright © 2026 Fanhackers. All rights reserved. Theme Spacious by ThemeGrill. Powered by: WordPress.